Stalled, Stuck or Stale The Blog For Brands That Don't Have It All Together

Why Tempur-Pedic is Losing Sleep

Today’s post is from Emily Griebel, an Integration Architect at McKee Wallwork & Company. Emily leads our Integration Architecture practice and is responsible for ensuring our clients’ marketing plans are seamlessly interwoven. If you’re interested in an audit of your marketing plan, you can reach her at EGriebel@mwcmail.com, or @MWCemily on Twitter.

Reading about Tempur-Pedic’s woes in the Wall Street Journal reminded me of an important marketing principle – one that we consistently preach:WHY TEMPER-PEDIC IS LOSING SLEEP

Attributes can be mimicked. Benefits can be matched. But brand ideas are the ultimate asset.

The Journal reported that Tempur-Pedic’s shares fell 49% as the company cut its second-quarter outlook, blaming tough competition in the memory-foam business it had until recently dominated. Tempur-Pedic is quickly losing share because competitors are introducing similar (cheaper and often better) products. The company’s marketing efforts have been focused on the memory-foam mattress, which as it turns out provided only temporary success.

Companies make this mistake over and over again. Think about the free continental breakfast at limited-service hotels, or free bottled water at airport parking lots, or cup holders in cars, or diet sodas. The list goes on and on.

Products and features can be easily replicated by competitors. A brand idea cannot. Think Nike, Apple, Coca-Cola, IBM, and GE. They aren’t promoting their shoes, or computers, or soda, or servers, or light bulbs. They are promoting what they believe in, what they stand for in the marketplace. Your brand (the core idea behind your business) is your intellectual property, which shouldn’t be easy to copy. And it should lead the way in your marketing efforts. (Don’t get me wrong. There’s a time and place for product-driven marketing, but it should always reinforce your brand idea.)

Car manufacturers have figured this out. Think about BMW’s Mini. It owns the idea of FUN! The car itself is fun, its billboards are fun, its apps are fun. Everything it does is fun. Of course, Mini also produces brochures that highlight the car’s products and features for those that are seriously considering buying one. But people don’t get interested in a Mini because of a list of features. They get interested because they want a FUN car.

Instead of merely touting a memory-foam mattress in its advertising, Tempur-Pedic should continually reinforce what the brand uniquely stands for – be that comfort, peace-of-mind, serenity, or any other of a number of relevant, compelling ideas. At the moment, the company is caught in a battle it can’t win; as soon as it rolls out the next great product or feature, the competition will follow and the cycle will continue.

We encounter this conundrum often as we work to revitalize stalled, stuck and stale brands. Companies come to us when they’re unsure what to do to get their brands up-and-running again, and one common trait among many is that they only market their “stuff”. We work diligently to help them discover (or rediscover) their reason for being, then build upon that foundation a long-term integrated marketing program. It’s hard work and heavy lifting, but it’s a proven approach.

Tempur-Pedic’s situation is unique, but its challenge is not. By reconciling why people buy with its reason for being, the brand can become more relevant and compelling than ever. And that could awaken a host of new customers.

Do You Know Where Your Company is Headed?

In a McKinsey Quarterly article entitled “The Social Side of Strategy”, authors Arne Gast and Michele Zanini tout the benefits of strategic crowdsourcing; i.e. a corporation opening up its strategic planning discussions to a wide range of employees.

It’s an interesting idea, particularly with respect to the authors’ claim that it boosts organizational alignment. According to Gast and Zanini, “One thing we and our colleagues have seen over and over again through our work is that many organizations struggle with strategic alignment: even at the healthiest companies, about 25 percent of employees are unclear about their company’s direction. That figure rises to nearly 60 percent for companies with poor organizational-health scores.”

That is consistent with our research into the reasons why stalled, stuck or stale companies tend to remain stalled, stuck or stale. In our practice, we repeatedly find that a lack of alignment is the No. 1 issue that needs to be dealt with prior to re-establishing healthy growth. Without it, even the best laid plans will go askew. To the extent that crowdsourcing is one way to achieve alignment, good for it.

The most important thing is to neither ignore nor neglect a lack of alignment, which can manifest itself in a variety of (sometimes subtle) ways. The downsides to misalignment are clear; on the upside, McKinsey’s research shows that companies in the top quartile of alignment are twice as likely to have above-median financial performance.

If you’re unsure about your own organization’s alignment, take this quick, simple self-diagnosis. Within about 60 seconds you’ll get a sense of how well aligned your company is. If you see a problem, it may actually be good news. Recognition is the first step in setting things straight.

Innovation is Nothing

What’s not to like about innovation? Plenty.

Not the concept of innovation, of course. Just the word itself. It’s overused, it’s underdelivered, and it’s much easier to invoke than it is to pull off.

While it’s difficult to name a company that doesn’t consider itself innovative, or value innovation (at least in terms of lip service), it’s easy to name companies that aren’t innovative.

I came across an article entitled “You Call That Innovation?” which cited a stunning statistic: public companies mentioned the term “innovation” in their financial reports more than 33,000 times last year, a 64% increase compared to five years earlier. The article also noted that more than 250 books with “innovation” in the title have been published in the past three (3!) months, and that four in 10 companies now have a chief innovation officer.

So where is all this innovation?

It’s not that it isn’t happening; we see innovation all around us. But it strikes me that actual innovations are not as widely or evenly distributed as innovation initiatives are. It’s not that companies don’t want to innovate. It’s that they don’t have the stomach for it. As with everything in business, execution is everything. And execution is bloody hard.

In our practice working with stalled, stuck and stale brands, we find this to be The Great Distinction that separates the winners from the losers. There aren’t many business challenges that can’t be strategically solved. But going from theory to practice requires the courage to change and the perseverance to see it through. We need look no further than the JC Penney debacle to see how fragile innovation initiatives can be.

The next time you’re tempted to invoke the “I” word, think twice. Do you want to merely develop new ideas, or are you committed to bringing them to life? Be honest. There’s nothing worse than seeing someone else execute your breakthrough concept. Except, perhaps, wondering what might have been.